Posts: 1,335
Threads: 205
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
19
I was thinking, time to time I uninstall my OS and sometime I might change the OS. During this time the activation key might work and sometimes it doesn't. From all this hustle, What if the activation is online oriented using ilok or another method. Steinberg has its own, Plugin alliance has its own, propellerheads has its own e.t.c . So I was looking forward to it as long as I don't use a dongle. The reason I don't like dongles are cause i'm not in the US. It will be hard going to get them and after I got them, they will take up the space of my usb port. Which is full.
Posts: 473
Threads: 16
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation:
6
I change (linux)os quite often on my laptop and i have always used the same licence-file. It's true that sometimes the licence file is not recognised, which i basically solve in changing it from a hidden fileto a non hidden file or vice versa. I never asked harrison to send me a new one. Some kind of low-level-geekery always did the trick.
I personally dont think that online activation is the way to go, as a lot of us won't allow internet access to their studio machine. For me, the licence-file is no problem.
But there was already a thread about ilok and most of the mb-users are opposed to that, me included.
Mixbus / Linux 64bit
Posts: 1,335
Threads: 205
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
19
I feel embarrassed when I ask ben to send me the activation key time after time that's why I came up with this Idea. If they don't get bored of me, That's ok with me. I love the activation method.
Posts: 1,335
Threads: 205
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation:
19
+1 Tassy BTW you make me laugh Brother.
Posts: 128
Threads: 25
Joined: May 2014
Reputation:
1
i hate ilok,it would be a no go for me
Posts: 4
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation:
0
Some softwares allow to choose either iLok or computer-related licences (I believe it's the case at Izotope for instance), this might be a good compromise? Another possibility is to store the licence on a USB key in a non-exclusive way: my Waves, Plugin Alliance and Nomad Factory licences for instance share the same key with no issue whatsoever. Plus, licence keys of all sorts can share a hub if necessary (I often heard rumours it wouldn't work with Steinberg keys and/or iLoks, but it actually does)...
Posts: 126
Threads: 1
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation:
2
01-09-2015, 05:50 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-09-2015, 05:51 AM by youki.)
I thought it was already stated that Ilok won't be used, am i wrong ? I don't think that Ilok would be cross-platform anyway (Linux).
Posts: 3,148
Threads: 441
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation:
40
My opinion on ilok as a tool is degrading its inventor, and degrades also the software producers that use it.
I am absolutely sure that, based on the unique high level the Harrison MB support has been, it will not degrade itself to that level.
Tassy
Posts: 636
Threads: 6
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation:
22
Wow. I'm no fan of ilok, but it does have some advantages IMO. Mainly you don't have to worry about keeping up with license files. I can install the software on various machines and just plug it into whichever I'm using and go. So while I don't expect harrison to change their system. It seems to work well. I wouldn't be upset if for some reason they did.
And as far as keeping up with licenses like mixbus uses, I keep those in a Dropbox folder called "licenses". And then in sub folders named after the vendor. Also pretty quick and painless. Plus they're backed up if my hard drive ever crashes.