Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
AVA Vocal Flow ?
#1
Anyone else having DSP problems with the AVA Vocal Flow?
On my desktop 16 trk session with a few third party plug-ins normally has a DSP load of 20%. As soon as I add AVA Vocal Flow on one trk, it sends DSP load into 100% land. It's unusable.
On my laptop, with a simple 4 trk session, no plug-ins at all. When I insert AVA VF on one trk, DSP maxes out and the session runs slow and chopped. This, too, is unusable.

Desktop
Windows 10 Pro v.2004
Intel I5-3470 @ 3.20Ghz
16gb RAM
Mixbus 6.1.22

Laptop
Windows 10 Home v. 1909
Intel I5-6200U @ 2.30Ghz
8gb RAM
Mixbus 6.1.22

Thx, datrakhaus
Reply
#2
(08-26-2020, 09:40 AM)datrakhaus Wrote: Anyone else having DSP problems with the AVA Vocal Flow?

Yes, I also saw a jump in DSP load but approx. the same as with many single plugins on a mixbus to get the same functionality as AVA - VF. Such a plugin with so many function build into it will use DSP. The problem for me though was not the DSP load, but nearly 2 thousand XRUNs in 2 minutes. The solution was to remove all other plugins on the same mixbus, get rid of any inactive plugins in the session and turn the CPU Hyperthread(HT) off. Now I run without XRUNs but with rather high DSP load. The XRUN problem could be related to HT to my logic.

Mixbus Pro 10.0, Kubuntu Linux 64 23.10, Stock Low latency kernel, KXstudio repos, i7-3720QM CPU@2.60GHz, 12 Gb RAM, nvidia GeForce GT 650M/PCIe/SSE2, X.org nouveau driver, Zoom L12 Digital mixer/Audio interface
Reply
#3
Happened to me also, CPU hit 100% when I inserted 20 AVA VocalFlows on 20 mono tracks (AVA still on demo).

I'm on PT2020.5 / MacBook Pro running Mojave.

So I decided to bypass Vocal Character and it seems to fix the CPU problem. Now, session run smoothly with CPU at 12%. Maybe because Vocal Character use lots of power to process signal.

Will test some more later before I buy the plugin.
Reply
#4
(08-28-2020, 10:03 AM)Narubett Wrote: Happened to me also, CPU hit 100% when I inserted 20 AVA VocalFlows on 20 mono tracks (AVA still on demo).

I'm on PT2020.5 / MacBook Pro running Mojave.

So I decided to bypass Vocal Character and it seems to fix the CPU problem. Now, session run smoothly with CPU at 12%. Maybe because Vocal Character use lots of power to process signal.

Will test some more later before I buy the plugin.

My issue is One instance of VF sent me to 100% immediately! On two different machines, set up differently.
Both unusable. Both with different sessions and trk counts. One used other plugs and the other used no plugs.
Reply
#5
It does a significant jump here, too - more than if I load all the individual plugins which are combined in VF individually.
But it's a very convenient way to do a vocal chain, too...

MMM
(I mentioned that to the developers directly...)
Linux throughout!
Main PC: XEON, 64GB DDR4, 1x SATA SSD, 1x NVME, MOTU UltraLite AVB
OS: Debian11 with KX atm

Mixbus 32C, Hydrogen, Jack... and Behringer synths
Reply
#6
(08-28-2020, 10:03 AM)Narubett Wrote: Happened to me also, CPU hit 100% when I inserted 20 AVA VocalFlows on 20 mono tracks (AVA still on demo).

I'm on PT2020.5 / MacBook Pro running Mojave.

So I decided to bypass Vocal Character and it seems to fix the CPU problem. Now, session run smoothly with CPU at 12%. Maybe because Vocal Character use lots of power to process signal.

Will test some more later before I buy the plugin.
When you first insert VF in PT it hits the CPU hard, but that settles down very quickly. VF is a complex plugin that is an entire channel strip/processing chain in one UI.
I have been using it for some time and in reality I tend to use 2 to 3 instances at any time (it is a Vocal tool), but I have tested with up to 32+ tracks of VF and have seen no issues at all with CPU.

@datrakhaus... your situation sounds unusual.
I would suggest you email plugins@harrisonconsoles.com, link this thread and any other info you can provide including sample freq etc.
Macmini 8,1 | OS X 13.6.3 | 3 GHz i5 32G | Scarlett 18i20 | Mixbus 10 | PT_2024.3.1 .....  Macmini 9,1 | OS X 14.4.1 | M1 2020 | Mixbus 10 | Resolve 18.6.5
Reply
#7
My DSP is also through the roof as well, didn't happen with the demo.
Reply
#8
(11-25-2020, 02:54 PM)Milt Wrote: My DSP is also through the roof as well, didn't happen with the demo.

I cannot understand that, there is no difference between the demo and the real thing other than having a lic.
Macmini 8,1 | OS X 13.6.3 | 3 GHz i5 32G | Scarlett 18i20 | Mixbus 10 | PT_2024.3.1 .....  Macmini 9,1 | OS X 14.4.1 | M1 2020 | Mixbus 10 | Resolve 18.6.5
Reply
#9
(11-25-2020, 04:09 PM)Dingo Wrote:
(11-25-2020, 02:54 PM)Milt Wrote: My DSP is also through the roof as well, didn't happen with the demo.

I cannot understand that, there is no difference between the demo and the real thing other than having a lic.
I can't understand it either, probably sloppy testing on my part. It is well worth the price I paid for it.
Reply
#10
Yes it's a great plugin
Macmini 8,1 | OS X 13.6.3 | 3 GHz i5 32G | Scarlett 18i20 | Mixbus 10 | PT_2024.3.1 .....  Macmini 9,1 | OS X 14.4.1 | M1 2020 | Mixbus 10 | Resolve 18.6.5
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)