Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Metal band tracked with Mixbus(wall of text)
#1
Hey all, I thought I would share my experience with going start to finish with a paid gig recording a college metal band in our home studio.
The first thing I'd like to address are the claims that sure, Mixbus sounds great, but its not all that great to track in. I whole-heartedly disagree. It was fantastic tracking in Mixbus. A large part of the time spent in the studio was actually trying different things to get the sound we were after. Since tracking and doing quick edits was so easy, we could focus all our time on the music.

The hardware is a Windows XP machine with 3gig ram and a duo core processor (can't remember the exact one at the moment). Attached to the computer is an M-Audio Delta 1010 (the full one with the outboard I/O unit). Attached to that are the outputs from the mixing board, a Mackie CFX-20.

That is where the weakest link is in our setup and we know it. We have to use the inserts on the board as our outputs (1/4" cable plugged half-way in). The preamps on the board are okay, but certainly not great for high quality recording. Next in line of course, are the mics. Again, because we are a home studio we don't have the largest selection of awesome mics.

Having said that, drums were tracked with a 57 on the snare, two Nady drum mics on the toms (high and low), Nady kick drum mic, and two Samson CO2s for overheads. Let me also add that I am a drummer, and I tried my hardest to convince their drummer NOT to use his snare, it sounded like I was hitting a tree with a whiffle ball bat. This quickly became by far my largest obstacle in the mixing phase. Yet he insisted....(sigh)

Guitar was tracked with a single 57 at a 45 degree angle, about 2 inches from the speaker. I placed the mic about halfway between the center of the cone and the edge. The guitarist had a sweet Peavey 6505+ head with a Mesa Boogie cab.
The bass was tracked DI through a SansAmp.

Vocals (and I don't endorse what they are singing about) were tracked with an AKG 214. This was the toughest part because in many of the tracks the vocalist would change between singing and screaming, and without access to my usual outboard compressor this was the hardest part to manage.

After everything was tracked, without hiccup I might add, then I could start mixing. A real advantage to Mixbus is that while we were listening back to what we recorded, I could change EQ, compression, routing, all of the bread and butter things that normally take a while in my other DAW (which is not a free one, but a rather expensive commercial DAW). This meant that when I got the tracks home to my mixing monitors, much of the work was already done, and I could dig in and start really mixing and editing. In terms of general stability, during recording Mixbus was solid as a rock. When mixing, it would crash every now and again if I tried the wrong plugin, but no work was ever lost.

Here is a song they posted on soundcloud:
https://soundcloud.com/hailthevisionary/...your-glass
EDIT: Explicit content! Don't listen with your kids around!

That's enough text for now. If anyone has any questions regarding anything throughout the process, just ask.
Reply
#2
Hey...I think the mix is really good and am happy to hear you had success and positive results with Mixbus. Congrats!

Were you able to implement the Mackie console we've chatted about?
Reply
#3
Quote: In terms of general stability, during recording Mixbus was solid as a rock. When mixing, it would crash every now and again if I tried the wrong plugin, but no work was ever lost.

Had a similar situation - fine when recording, glitches on playback - using Windows XP (SP3) on a 2Gig RAM box. Switched to AVLinux 6.0.1 and the same tracks played back just fine - once they all got loaded.

best,

john
Reply
#4
Yes, I had some glitches during playback under windows as well, not just problems with plugins. I would get the occasional stutter in playback. I use KXStudio at home, but at the studio I haven't convinced dad to drop his clutch on the software he knows and loves. Not that I blame him, it works for him. The next project I undertake will be with a new Mackie board and completely under Linux. I'm very excited.
Thanks for the kind words Brianiac. Unfortunately no, the Mackie board I'm looking at isn't mine yet. But it will be.Wink And I was mistaken before, its not a Mackie Onyx 1640i, its a Mackie Onyx 1640 with the Firewire option. Unfortunate, but still a really nice board.
Reply
#5
(10-24-2013, 03:10 AM)Qualitymix Wrote: ...the Mackie board I'm looking at isn't mine yet. But it will be.Wink And I was mistaken before, its not a Mackie Onyx 1640i, its a Mackie Onyx 1640 with the Firewire option. Unfortunate, but still a really nice board.

I'm very pleased with mine and think you will be, as well. I've tried selling mine many times to no avail, however, every time I use it I'm really happy with it. I simply am not typically putting it to the use it deserves. Tons of connectivity options and with the FW has been my best Mixbus hardware interface of the options I have.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)