Posts: 5
Threads: 1
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation:
0
11-18-2015, 12:04 PM
Hi. Whenever I make a recording it ends up being slightly ahead of what I have recorded before.
To check it wasn't my playing, I tested it by loading in a drum loop and then recording it back through a mic onto another track in Mixbus; and, sure enough, the recording was slightly ahead (maybe half a second) of the drum loop.
Any ideas?
Thanks.
Posts: 3,159
Threads: 105
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation:
134
Wow, a half-second is a really long time. That sounds like something is terribly wrong.
In the "Audio setup" window, there's a function at the bottom which "calibrates" your I/O latency. Click that button and follow the directions to calibrate your system.
Note that some devices, such as USB, inherently change latency with each reboot of your computer.
Then re-run your test with a simple, brand-new session. If you still have the problem, I suggest that you write our support email (mixbus@harrisonconsoles.com) directly so we can work on the problem more closely.
Best,
-Ben
Posts: 5
Threads: 1
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation:
0
11-19-2015, 08:26 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-19-2015, 08:26 AM by chrisk.)
Thanks for your reply.
I restarted and the latency reduced a bit - but it's still not in sync.
I tried the calibration and it says I have inverted wiring as it comes up with a negative figure. (I'm 99% sure I have the wiring the right way around)
I'm using an Audient ID22 USB interface by the way. It works fine in an old copy of Cubase I have. So I wonder if it's something to do with the Port Audio and the Audient ID22 (if I select the direct ASIO Audio System option instead of the Port Audio ASIO option it crashes).
I think I might need to email support with this one.
Posts: 282
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation:
8
AFAIK the calibration is only to calibrate for ADDITIONAL latency (apart form the buffers) - for example the one caused by the converters. So as the recording is AHEAD it's not the right tool here.
The recording being ahead seems more like Mixbus thinks your interface is using a higher buffer size than it actually does. So a first step might be to compare the settings in Mixbus' audio setup with those of the control software of your interface.
Disclaimer: Any resemblance of my nick with a given engineer is purely coincidental!
Desktop: AMD Phenom II x6, 4 GB RAM, Radeon graphics, RME HDSP 9652
Laptop: Thinkpad E560, i3 6100U, 8 GB RAM, Intel graphics, Tascam US-2x2
X32 Rack - Debian GNU/Linux - 32c
Posts: 16
Threads: 5
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation:
1
1024 samples buffer seems to high for recording, i usually use a buffer at 256 samples, that gives me decent latency
An Audio interface with good written drivers should have no problem using 256 samples or even 128 samples..
jan_krakeli@hotmail.com