low reactive graphics V10

[Tzadik]

Hi,
I'm testing the new Mixbus V10 but I'm surprised by the responsiveness of the graphics. For example, the level meters seem slow and unrelated to the sound produced and the responsiveness of the graphics of the plugins as well.
12 tracks in the sessions and six busses used. Six active plugins for all
Buffer 1024 or 128 changes nothing
Performance is set to everything except one processor
macbook pro 15 - 2018 - I7 2.6ghz - 6 core - 16 g ram
Besides, I don't have any kind of problems with Cubase or Luna.

An idea please ?

Thanks 
Did

[jeff_sloan]

What OS ver and what screen resolution?
External monitor? If so, how connected, HDMI?

Does it lag like that with only the built-in monitor with external not connected?

[Tzadik]

I use the monitor built into the Mac
Sonoma 14.4.1
15.4-inch screen (2880 x 1800)
No more

[Tzadik]

I specify the default resolution is 1680 X 1050

[Stephan S]

Go to Preferences/ Quirks and uncheck both boxes

[Tzadik]

Thanks Stephan but it's the same.
on the other hand if I reduce the mixbus window it goes better ......

[jeff_sloan]

I hate to beat a dead horse, but I bet if you go down to Ventura, it will fix it for ya...

[Stephan S]

Thanks Stephan but it's the same.
on the other hand if I reduce the mixbus window it goes better ......

What also helps is to increase buffersize, don't know if it is just the audio delay compensating it, or if it is a shared memory thing.
However, in V10 with the unchecked boxes, I have the graphics running in front of audio when I go 4096

For me it made a big difference compared to V9- here the lag wasn't any better on Ventura- actually the whole thing started with V8.2 and the invention of the new transpareny stuff so good sound needs in the first place.
From this time on, Mixbus was useless for me and I did my projects with V6 on my backup machine. Support tried to help, but ignores me now- probably because I dared to ask for a maintenance update or at least compensation for having purchased two upgrades without having any gain, other than doing experiments.

[Tzadik]

Not really excited about the ventura procedure just to try V10
I don't understand
On Harrison's website it is clearly stated ok with Sonoma.
Not very engaging as a test.
However, the workflow looks great, the ergonomics too, intuitive and fast.
From my experience other software works normally under Sonoma.
Shouldn't things move more on Harrison's side?
It seems difficult to me for Harrison (SSL) to attract new users with this kind of problem, even though the project is great
I was ready to try the Mixbus adventure but now I have doubts

[Maux65]

Thanks Stephan but it's the same.
on the other hand if I reduce the mixbus window it goes better ......

Have you tried:

Apperarance > Graphic Acceleration > Yes, low resolution? 

On my iMace Late 2013 with Catalina in this way i've a less sluggish interface.